Cody Plofker nailed it and I think it explains why people have such wildly different experiences with Claude Code.

“It’s just autocomplete that hallucinates.” And “I shipped an entire feature while making coffee.” Same tool. Completely different realities.

The gap is almost always context and progression level. Claude Code is unusually sensitive to setup. Your CLAUDE .md, your memory files, your skills, how you structure tasks before execution starts. Someone who dropped it in a folder and started typing is playing a different game than someone who built that scaffolding.

And then there’s the loop Cody describes. Early levels are genuinely hard. The mistakes are hard to catch before they compound. Most people quit here and write the whole thing off.

The ones who push through develop instincts. They learn when to course correct, how to front-load the thinking, how to read the output. Each breakthrough stacks.

The tool doesn’t get better. You do. So both people are probably telling the truth. They’re just on different levels.

Media